> On June 25, 2016, 10:29 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
> > Latest patch still seems like forced solution.  Why not just allow the 
> > alert definition to provide "data" attribute (or whatever) in json that 
> > port_alert can use?
> 
> Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
>     Thanks for reviewing. I've tried to chagne the code as you said, but that 
> requires to change the Ambari metadata DB schema.
>     It seemed exaggerated to me, but the fact is remained that my latest 
> patch isn't a simple solution.
>     
>     Which one do you (or community) prefer? I'll try to follw the idea.
> 
> Nate Cole wrote:
>     If you change the "source" part of the definition (or use "parameters" 
> object in that) then you don't need to change schema.

Sorry for the late reply, and thank you for advise.
I update the patch, just to add "socket_command" attribute in "source" part


- Masahiro


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/#review139457
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 4, 2016, 7:01 p.m., Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 4, 2016, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Florian Barca, Jonathan Hurley, and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17253
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17253
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are too many WARNING in ZooKeeper log.
> ```
> 2016-06-15 21:02:15,405 - WARN  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:2181:NIOServerCnxn@357] - caught end of 
> stream exception
> EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client sessionid 
> 0x0, likely client has closed socket
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:228)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> ```
> 
> It may be because of Ambari Alert. Ambari Alert pings to the zookeeper port 
> to do monitoring.
> We should use 'ruok' to monitor zookeepers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/alerts/port_alert.py 1918327 
>   ambari-agent/src/test/python/ambari_agent/TestPortAlert.py dffa56c 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/alert/PortSource.java
>  d7279de 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/ZOOKEEPER/3.4.5/alerts.json 
> 469036a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> 
> ```
> +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811835/AMBARI-17253.2.patch
> against trunk revision .
> +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
> +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
> +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
> compiler warnings.
> +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
> release audit warnings.
> +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in .
> Test results: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//testReport/
> Console output: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//console
> This message is automatically generated.
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Masahiro Tanaka
> 
>

Reply via email to