> On July 12, 2016, 8:30 p.m., Jonathan Hurley wrote:
> > I'm going to +1 this, but I'd still like to know how other commiters feel 
> > about making the socket commands paramters vs actual parts of the source 
> > element.
> 
> Jayush Luniya wrote:
>     Parameters make more sense for script alerts than port alerts in my 
> opinion.

I agree with Jayush and Jonathan: writing/reading from a port alert feels like 
it should be part of the source element.


- Nate


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/#review141993
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 11, 2016, 5:50 p.m., Masahiro Tanaka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 11, 2016, 5:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Florian Barca, Jonathan Hurley, and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17253
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17253
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are too many WARNING in ZooKeeper log.
> ```
> 2016-06-15 21:02:15,405 - WARN  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:2181:NIOServerCnxn@357] - caught end of 
> stream exception
> EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client sessionid 
> 0x0, likely client has closed socket
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:228)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> ```
> 
> It may be because of Ambari Alert. Ambari Alert pings to the zookeeper port 
> to do monitoring.
> We should use 'ruok' to monitor zookeepers.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/alerts/port_alert.py 1918327 
>   ambari-agent/src/test/python/ambari_agent/TestPortAlert.py dffa56c 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/alert/PortSource.java
>  d7279de 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog240.java
>  7ef12a7 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/ZOOKEEPER/3.4.5/alerts.json 
> 469036a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48972/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean test
> 
> ```
> +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811835/AMBARI-17253.2.patch
> against trunk revision .
> +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
> +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
> +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
> compiler warnings.
> +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
> release audit warnings.
> +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in .
> Test results: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//testReport/
> Console output: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/7427//console
> This message is automatically generated.
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Masahiro Tanaka
> 
>

Reply via email to