-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50150/#review142597
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




Just one syntax nit really.  Any new tests?


ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/AmbariManagementControllerImpl.java
 (lines 2499 - 2502)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/50150/#comment208221>

    Use Entry<?, ?> iterators here


- Nate Cole


On July 18, 2016, 2:30 p.m., Robert Levas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50150/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 18, 2016, 2:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jonathan Hurley, and Nate 
> Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17772
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17772
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Kerberos-related configs are not applied before INSTALL command is built on 
> add service.  
> 
> This occurs when new services and components are added to an existing cluster 
> where Kerberos is enabled. Due to the order of when command detail (JSON) 
> structures are built and when service configurations are set, 
> Kerberos-related configurations will not be available for new services.  This 
> is a regression created by the patch for AMBARI-17629.
> 
> *Solution*
> Ensure that Kerberos-related configuration updates are applied before the 
> INSTALL command details are created.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/AmbariManagementControllerImpl.java
>  b2a3761 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50150/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested in UI and Blueprint installations
> 
> # Local test results: PENDING
> 
> # Jenkins test results: PENDING
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert Levas
> 
>

Reply via email to