> On Aug. 10, 2016, 4:17 p.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.0.6/services/stack_advisor.py,
> >  line 664
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50948/diff/1/?file=1469759#file1469759line664>
> >
> >     Can you add some comment about this growth function?
> 
> Dmytro Sen wrote:
>     Attached graph to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18098
>     
>     Recommended cache size is based on number of sinks in the cluster - for 
> small cluster recommended cache size is 200, for large up to 800

Excellent, although we should make sure AMS memory setting is scaled by the 
same factor else this could cause OOM ?


- Sid


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50948/#review145348
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 10, 2016, 12:25 p.m., Dmytro Sen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50948/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 10, 2016, 12:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Aravindan Vijayan, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, and Sid 
> Wagle.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-18098
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18098
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> stack_advisor should recommend AMS cache size and commit frequency depending 
> on cluster size
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.0.6/services/stack_advisor.py 
> 87618a8 
>   ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.2/common/test_stack_advisor.py 
> 3f41acb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50948/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests passed
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmytro Sen
> 
>

Reply via email to