> On Сен. 12, 2016, 9:08 д.п., Aleksandr Kovalenko wrote:
> > ambari-web/app/models/host_component.js, line 333
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49804/diff/1/?file=1439630#file1439630line333>
> >
> >     What is the reason for this change?
> >     Why we decide to not show Enable label if HA is already enabled?
> 
> wang yaoxin wrote:
>     Thank you ,Aleksandr . Just like the NameNode HA , it's better to decide 
> the RM Enable lable and cssClass

I see, thanks.


- Aleksandr


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49804/#review148468
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Сен. 12, 2016, 3:24 д.п., wang yaoxin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49804/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Сен. 12, 2016, 3:24 д.п.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Aleksandr Kovalenko, jun aoki, Zhe (Joe) Wang, 
> Srimanth Gunturi, and Yusaku Sako.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17518
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17518
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> improve the resourcemanager HA description
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-web/app/models/host_component.js 973b809 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49804/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> done
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> wang yaoxin
> 
>

Reply via email to