-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55213/#review160726
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Robert Levas


On Jan. 6, 2017, 5:20 a.m., Dmytro Sen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55213/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 6, 2017, 5:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, Robert Levas, Sid Wagle, 
> and Vitalyi Brodetskyi.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-19388
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19388
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When you are trying to disable security om perf cluster it fails.
> 1) For cluster with 1200 agents it works fine but for cluster with 1850 
> agents it fails.
> 2) According to what i found, root cause is PUT request to 
> http://<ambari_server_host>:8080/api/v1/clusters/<cluster_name> with data 
> like "security_type" : "NONE". So, this request trying to change security 
> type from KERBEROS to NONE and fails by timeout of three minutes.
> 3) Interesting thing, request to change security type fails and UI showing 
> Error on disable security window. But in the same time in BG operations 
> process which destroying keytabs proceed work.
> 4) One more thing. After failed disabling kerberos, if you will click restart 
> the same request(update security type) will finish work in a few seconds.
> So, what we need to do is to connect profiler and find out what exactly take 
> so much time for request to change security type.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/AmbariCustomCommandExecutionHelper.java
>  0cf46df 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55213/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests passed
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmytro Sen
> 
>

Reply via email to