> On Jan. 11, 2017, 9:24 p.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/ATLAS/0.1.0.2.3/package/scripts/service_check.py,
> >  line 37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55382/diff/1/?file=1601257#file1601257line37>
> >
> >     We need to be able to tolerate a max of 10-20% down nodes.
> >     Service Checks need to be robust to these type of intermittent failures.
> >     If just 1/300 hosts Atlas hosts is bad, I don't want this to cause 
> > failures for features like Rolling Upgrade.

@Alejandro - what should the service_check do? Break the loop after first 
success?


- Madhan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55382/#review161297
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 10, 2017, 3:54 p.m., Vishal Suvagia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55382/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 10, 2017, 3:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Gautam Borad, Jaimin Jetly, 
> Madhan Neethiraj, Mugdha Varadkar, and Oliver Szabo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-19386
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19386
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Atlas service check fails as its hard coded to run check against the same 
> host where service check is running. It should instead run check against 
> ATLAS metadata server host.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/ATLAS/0.1.0.2.3/package/scripts/params.py
>  6a53b1a 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/ATLAS/0.1.0.2.3/package/scripts/service_check.py
>  8e27b38 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55382/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified install on centos6.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishal Suvagia
> 
>

Reply via email to