-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62250/#review185250
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Jayush Luniya


On Sept. 12, 2017, 4:58 p.m., Aravindan Vijayan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62250/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2017, 4:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Dmytro Sen, Jayush Luniya, and Sid Wagle.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-21939
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21939
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> PROBLEM: HDFS Heatmaps are not showing data (Not Applicable) for bytes read, 
> bytes written & DataNode Process Network I/O Utilization
> 
> EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: Heatmaps should show data
> 
> ACTUAL BEHAVIOUR: Data is being shown as Not Applicable (Grey Box)
> 
> ANALYSIS
> This is reproducible in Ambari 2.2.2 and Ambari 2.5.1.0. If you go to HDFS, 
> then click on Heatmaps, you can see the API call go to
> fields=host_components/metrics/dfs/datanode/bytes_written._rate 
> however this returns no values. If you remove ._rate then you can see the 
> values which you would expect.
> Attach one or more files to this issue
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog260.java
>  9e145c0 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/widgets.json 
> bcfb2cc 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.3/services/HDFS/widgets.json 
> eeb9ff8 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/PERF/1.0/services/FAKEHDFS/widgets.json
>  7a793f8 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog260Test.java
>  db6ebc1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62250/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested.
> UpgradeCatalog260 test added.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aravindan Vijayan
> 
>

Reply via email to