-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62809/#review187335
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessor.java
Lines 2783 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62809/#comment264257>

    can these variables calculated at params.py in the stack code instead of 
putting to the BlueprintConfigurationProcessor? (using jinja2 variables at 
configurations - you can get the proper hosts from command.json input). just 
because the ambari server java code could be independent from druid. im not too 
big fan of this class, we should get rid of it sooner or later
    
    but you can drop this issue if zou do not want to do it, it's just a 
reccomendation from me.


- Oliver Szabo


On Oct. 6, 2017, 3:35 p.m., Attila Doroszlai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62809/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 6, 2017, 3:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Nishant Bangarwa, Slim Bouguerra, and Swapan 
> Shridhar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-22159
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22159
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Replace placeholders in `metastore_hostname`, 
> `druid.metadata.storage.connector.connectURI` and `druid.zk.service.host` 
> when creating cluster via blueprint.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessor.java
>  5a6e2cc0de7dc0c0f4499624e21c43bbc8d24b54 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessorTest.java
>  68d6349db0207ab6df44b4b0a341c77ecabc46ea 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62809/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested manually on local cluster.
> 
> Unit tests pass: `Tests run: 4900, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 36`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Attila Doroszlai
> 
>

Reply via email to