-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64173/#review192164
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/actionmanager/ExecutionCommandWrapper.java
Lines 303-304 (original), 303-304 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64173/#comment270211>

    Adjust documention to indicate why !resolved() is necessary.


- Jonathan Hurley


On Nov. 29, 2017, 3 p.m., Attila Doroszlai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64173/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 29, 2017, 3 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Jonathan Hurley, Nate Cole, and Robert Nettleton.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-22550
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22550
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Only send `/commandParams/version` if it is resolved: using unresolved 
> version eg. `2.6.3.0` only causes problems.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/actionmanager/ExecutionCommandWrapper.java
>  212363b85f1ef4f4b3b91f0ddb2fe91cd897d5dc 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/actionmanager/ExecutionCommandWrapperTest.java
>  7630c553c0e55ffa314f02bc9c68337d502a93be 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64173/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> * Tested cluster creation: verified that resolved version (eg. 2.6.3.0-235) 
> is sent in "start" commands (and version is absent in "install" commands), 
> and that WebHCat server is started OK.
> * Tested service auto-restart for regression per steps in 
> [AMBARI-22025](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22025).
> * Added unit test.  `Tests run: 4931, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 34`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Attila Doroszlai
> 
>

Reply via email to