-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34300/#review84021
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Master (07ab0bb) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On May 16, 2015, 12:01 a.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34300/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 16, 2015, 12:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It's possible to define nested refs that can cause the executor to stack 
> trace, e.g.
> {{derp[{{thermos.ports[http]}}]}} is perfectly valid but crashes the executor.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/config/__init__.py 
> dd2f89014a3da730364b14e01c499ac0f2c288c1 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/config/schema/base.py 
> a87524a8b3ad5aa0e337e0a0028cecb85865b4e6 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/config/thrift.py 
> 810febb637d168b07c4aea77984e1d1451a39af2 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/task_info.py 
> d110faf08135d94d9af95ad74613950c56248c09 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/config/dsl.py 
> 0663a9ad8ae194b63ce6d77dabfe65564e2d26dd 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/config/loader.py 
> d77ab9a52b16e9d65acdb95f01fd251ae8ab2b6e 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/test_config.py 
> c56779712b91f621261358aa7ebd6c4fc65446a0 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/config/test_thrift.py 
> 654c0b5ae82c98db163c7a44301ff6b23e19b211 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/test_task_info.py 
> 102ba531aa6c28f2d74bd0d7f1668e5861e3a6b8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34300/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added some regression tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Wickman
> 
>

Reply via email to