-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35793/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated June 23, 2015, 6:28 p.m.)


Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.


Changes
-------

Remove stale TODO.


Bugs: AURORA-1298
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1298


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

DbTaskStore: delete unreferenced job keys.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/DbTaskStore.java 
30e3469a9f69091b929a9243f84036fa2fdd0539 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/TaskConfigManager.java 
3ada6286e6ef6e3302802b74eec6c46dd582dc10 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/TaskConfigMapper.java 
7ee001f9c019a1e7b669ae5cec6088bf974a3746 
  
src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/TaskConfigMapper.xml 
8258fb102b7f5fca9635143ebaed542d43abeb9f 
  src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/schema.sql 
24cf52680b69e23f5ccbbcada0606975b0405d5b 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/AbstractTaskStoreTest.java 
63a784f843eb7edf9a13c623e5355169c7e8623b 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/DbTaskStoreTest.java 
dda988d03634f8de582cf2b8ccdeb433c3e3de0c 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35793/diff/


Testing
-------

Note that this removes a defensive branch wherein we checked for inbound config 
references before attempting to delete.  With this change, we proactively 
delete and count on foreign key constraints to prevent deletion of rows that 
are still referenced.  I propose we adopt this as our pattern for handling 
shared references, as it seems to be the most sane approach available.

A gotcha with this case is that i do not believe mybatis provides a 
vendor-neutral approach to identify a consistency violation, and the best 
signal is a generic `PersistenceException`.  This is unfortunate since we can't 
distinguish between a hopeless query with invalid syntax, a network 
disconnection, or the anticipated case of a consistency violation.


Thanks,

Bill Farner

Reply via email to