> On Sept. 2, 2015, 5:08 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Ship It!

procedural question - I see there's a long-running 0.9.x branch - should I 
merge this to master then merge this into that branch?


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/#review97573
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora-packaging
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Remove openjdk runtime requirement.
> 
> This addresses one of my +0s.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle 
> jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in 
> transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was 
> running under the new JVM.
> 
> ```
> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep 
> 'jvm_prop_java_vendor '
> jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation
> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ 
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Sweeney
> 
>

Reply via email to