> On Sept. 15, 2015, 1:20 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > docs/configuration-reference.md, lines 344-355
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/2/?file=1073338#file1073338line344>
> >
> >     Tiers seems like a significant enough topic to warrant its own page 
> > with some more context and better flow.  As it stands, it's really hard to 
> > understand what exactly a tier is and why i want or need to define them. 
> >     
> >     Also, you might consider dropping the term 'best-effort' and stick to 
> > 'revocable' to avoid overloading the naming.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     | Tiers seems like a significant enough topic to warrant its own page 
> with some more context and better flow.  As it stands, it's really hard to 
> understand what exactly a tier is and why i want or need to define them. 
>     
>     Agree. I am hesitant to promote the `tier` concept though until we fully 
> conceptualize it in AURORA-1443. As it stands now, it only supports 
> `revocable` value and has zero meaning outside the revocable offer work. 
>     
>     | Also, you might consider dropping the term 'best-effort' and stick to 
> 'revocable' to avoid overloading the naming.
>     
>     Sure, works for me.
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     The intention is not to promote it (disclaimers are fine), but rather to 
> paint the picture and not leave the reader hanging.  Doesn't have to be a lot 
> of content, but some indication of how it fits in and the development status 
> would go a long way.

I am uncomfortable promoting a half-baked concept until the migration plan and 
implementation details are fully fleshed out. I feel that AURORA-1343 and 
AURORA-1443 linked above give enough additional info for curiously minded 
without restating the points already defined in the design doc (mentioned in 
the above tickets).


- Maxim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#review98977
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 16, 2015, 12:38 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 16, 2015, 12:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1441
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1441
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding oversubscription summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/configuration-reference.md ad2701cadd38bb2fdbbe2acc477038986f8ec733 
>   docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 8db0e615b6abe6865a889dbcfb24271655caaee6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Private remote: 
> https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/oversubscription_docs/docs/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to