-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39089/#review101783
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Maxim Khutornenko


On Oct. 7, 2015, 3:31 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39089/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 7, 2015, 3:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I encountered this in another patch, where code coverage was required for a 
> constant-only utility class.  I think the new filters are simpler to 
> understand and more appropriate.  As indicated by the patch, it also pointed 
> out some areas where test coverage is legitimately lacking (we technically 
> had coverage in the constructor, but no other methods).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/aurora/build/CoverageReportCheck.groovy 
> b47175666159128a98f731e157d5a1eb936a94bb 
>   config/legacy_untested_classes.txt 88a71dfc694e633bc91ae053d07286bed7fcd3ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39089/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to