-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40889/#review108758
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/python/BUILD (line 14)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40889/#comment168218>

    Am I reading this as revving up mesos native version in Aurora? If so, we 
should also update build.gradle and possibly update make-mesos-native-egg 
script. Previous effort as a reference: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37379


- Maxim Khutornenko


On Dec. 2, 2015, 11:57 p.m., Steve Niemitz wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40889/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2015, 11:57 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed mesos native lib to use mesos.executor instead
> 
> Without any context this doesnt really make any sense.
> 
> I've created a seperate mesos native lib that only contains a minimal set of 
> code needed to run the ExecutorDriver.  This library has very few 
> requirements, making it a much better option for running in docker 
> containers, as well as allowing a thermos_executor.pex built on one linux 
> distro to run on most others.
> 
> The mesos side of this is here: 
> https://github.com/tellapart/mesos/commit/46bedd5db73b535a0e4efe94730500b6da2ec7d8
> and I'll be opening a RB request on the mesos side soon.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/python/BUILD 7ef81d13afa0089d7e8a779e71b53e0fc1848466 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/BUILD 
> 0be65fc7c180d15f5a94bef268652ef7b868dcf7 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/bin/thermos_executor_main.py 
> b3e8bf1e924999306e0b8a1314273b22c51028e7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40889/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Niemitz
> 
>

Reply via email to