> On Dec. 14, 2015, 4:47 a.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> > I'd vote for sticking with 0.24.1, as Mesos devs have just recently urged 
> > users not to skip updates 
> > (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@mesos.apache.org/msg05379.html).
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     +1. I don't think we can skip 0.24 due to protobuf -> JSON format change 
> in master ZK registration: 
> http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/upgrades/. My understanding is 
> that 0.25 does not have dual write for ZK making seemless upgrade impossible.

Thanks for the input.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41315/#review110215
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 12, 2015, 8:49 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41315/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 12, 2015, 8:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Outstanding question - can we go straight to 0.25.0?  Based on the upgrade 
> docs [1], it doesn't appear that would be problematic.  If we can do it, i 
> think we should do so and i am happy to update this patch.
> 
> [1] http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/upgrades/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/python/BUILD 1a80d66d0ab3a920cf1ddd774c922dbd71c574ad 
>   NEWS 6e158d0495afe8581540a1d9eba3082ada627fd3 
>   build-support/python/make-mesos-native-egg 
> 47438c5b71d686c4a42ae3f46f3a7093b34f3909 
>   build.gradle aeefc572c4dd854bb263000c740af8570085123d 
>   docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 812beafdc3b4c47fdc813d2dd2299b63407f8011 
>   examples/vagrant/provision-dev-cluster.sh 
> 3e4bf325601fc2326743b1344d64980e8c881a11 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41315/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Successfully ran end-to-end tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to