-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42077/#review113825
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Master (f064dc1) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Jan. 11, 2016, 7:32 p.m., George Sirois wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42077/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 11, 2016, 7:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1575
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1575
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This flag allows cluster administrators to set arbitrary
> Docker parameters which will apply to all jobs.
> 
> Also cleans up some of the existing unit tests around task config.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   README.md f3b23247cf3f7e550c1714b4fb8227a2baab3b41 
>   
> commons/src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/common/args/parsers/MultimapParser.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 8a1e68e5d54e9b8b66139bfc731563668584fa77 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/AppModule.java 
> 4eee8e31a4ccd25ba4a5bcb60b67c79979c3b9b0 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/TaskTestUtil.java 
> d7f3c60d383cf10afb0c0fcf4fe29972b183458c 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/ConfigurationManager.java
>  05e8b714043dea89039ce9a1fc4b32c65ab15fe4 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/ConfigurationManagerTest.java
>  f3b62cc957186bc9673060830572bc1cc073ac49 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42077/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> George Sirois
> 
>

Reply via email to