-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42984/#review117064
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Master (0eb753d) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Jan. 29, 2016, 11:56 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42984/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 29, 2016, 11:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell, Maxim Khutornenko, and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Hints of this protocol exist down in step 6 when a release succeeds,
> but this places the failure action in-line in the step process to make
> it more likely the reader does the right thing.
> 
> Also kill an incorrect instruction to send the successful release vote
> result email to the private@ list.
> 
>  docs/committers.md | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/committers.md a0a3cf55a25f2e97cc1f8d16e9ea549fef2fffd4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42984/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I have no clue if the instructions and provided example link are correct.
> I did find variation when reading past [RESULT][VOTE] failures; so
> guidance on what is required vs what is personal flair is appreciated.
> 
> Rendered here: 
> https://github.com/jsirois/aurora/blob/jsirois/release-docs/more-fixes/docs/committers.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Sirois
> 
>

Reply via email to