-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45115/#review124628
-----------------------------------------------------------



Does anyone think it would make sense to add a task w/ a final process to the 
e2e suite to avoid future breakages like this in the future?

- Joshua Cohen


On March 21, 2016, 6:36 p.m., Amol Deshmukh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45115/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 21, 2016, 6:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1642
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1642
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> AURORA-1642: Fix for broken finalization in Thermos runner.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/core/process.py 
> f147af7d0e84309691c135c8057a597379fa83e7 
>   src/test/python/apache/thermos/core/test_process.py 
> c339c91eb24616c8d640877ef088f659523d2bf5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45115/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> # End to end tests
> ```
> $ ./src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh
> ...
> *** OK (All tests passed) ***
> ```
> 
> # Python unit tests
> ```
> $ ./pants test src/test/python::
> ...
>                       663 passed, 5 skipped, 1 warnings in 180.34 seconds
> 
> ```
> 
> # Also tested using a test job in vagrant to ensure that "final" processes 
> are executed as expected using this job definition:
> https://gist.github.com/adeshmukh/697d013dec64498a3942
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amol Deshmukh
> 
>

Reply via email to