> On March 28, 2016, 3:30 p.m., John Sirois wrote: > > Zameer - this one is yours to take home. I figure you have Maxim's ear and > > you two can work out the remainder and patch this in.
I still don't see much value in loosening version boundaries but don't intend to impede the consensus here. - Maxim ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/#review125642 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 23, 2016, 2:56 p.m., Pierre Cheynier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 23, 2016, 2:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell, John Sirois, Stephan Erb, Bill > Farner, and Zameer Manji. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > ------- > > We should consider MESOS_VERSION as the minimal requirement to install > the current Aurora version instead of enforce a specific Mesos version. > > > Diffs > ----- > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec 61e7d146108ae7dd5e129d8288a05773c2659d25 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45212/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Install Aurora through the RPM built with aurora-packaging on a Mesos 0.27 > running install. > > > Thanks, > > Pierre Cheynier > >
