> On March 31, 2016, 6:26 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/LeaderHealth.java, line 47
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/diff/4/?file=1320481#file1320481line47>
> >
> >     Let's make this endpoint browser-friendly too and include some text.  
> > How about something like:
> >     
> >     ```
> >     This is the leading scheduler.
> >     
> >     This endpoint can indicate to a load balancer which of a group of 
> > schedulers is leading.  The response codes are:
> >     200: This is the leading scheduler.
> >     xxx: Another scheduler is leading.
> >     yyy: There is no leader currently, or the leader is unknown.
> >     ```

Done


- Ashwin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/#review126383
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 31, 2016, 5:06 a.m., Ashwin Murthy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2016, 5:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> AURORA-1493: create ELB-friendly endpoint to detect leading scheduler. The 
> fix is to add a new endpoint - "/leaderhealth" which returns http status code 
> 200 (OK) if the instance is the leader. If the instance is not the leader but 
> a leading exists, returns 500 (Internal server error). If there is no leader 
> at all, returns 503 (Service unavailable)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/LeaderHealth.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/LeaderHealthTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new unit test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashwin Murthy
> 
>

Reply via email to