> On April 4, 2016, 8:31 p.m., Aurora ReviewBot wrote:
> > Master (9847b02) is green with this patch.
> >   ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh
> > 
> > I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing 
> > "@ReviewBot retry"

Bill, will you be merging? Thanks!


- Ashwin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/#review126933
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 4, 2016, 7:43 p.m., Ashwin Murthy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 4, 2016, 7:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> AURORA-1493: create ELB-friendly endpoint to detect leading scheduler. The 
> fix is to add a new endpoint - "/leaderhealth" which returns http status code 
> 200 (OK) if the instance is the leader. If the instance is not the leader but 
> a leading exists, returns 500 (Internal server error). If there is no leader 
> at all, returns 503 (Service unavailable)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   RELEASE-NOTES.md 6fc3afeb5a9e2f2c2ba944fbc6d611d3494eb779 
>   docs/reference/scheduler-endpoints.md PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/JettyServerModule.java 
> df649ff4ffdc741afdbc4850c2dbf98bd3e218f1 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/LeaderHealth.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/resources/scheduler/assets/index.html 
> 861d5518890182737c6e545d6c409004c23cd18d 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/LeaderHealthTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh 
> e1c12bbd4382c31e576439f6693d82d5661029b9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45511/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new unit test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashwin Murthy
> 
>

Reply via email to