> On April 28, 2016, 3:54 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > build-support/packer/build.sh, line 37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46786/diff/1/?file=1364773#file1364773line37>
> >
> > What about the `java2-runtime-headless` proposed in that pull request?
> > Did you find it redundant?
I found that java2-runtime-headless did not work at all:
...
virtualbox-ovf: Package java2-runtime-headless is a virtual package
provided by:
virtualbox-ovf: openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u91-b14-0ubuntu4~14.04
virtualbox-ovf: openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b38-1.13.10-0ubuntu0.14.04.1
virtualbox-ovf: openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u95-2.6.4-0ubuntu0.14.04.2
virtualbox-ovf: gcj-4.8-jre-headless 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1
virtualbox-ovf: gcj-jre-headless 4:4.8.2-1ubuntu6
virtualbox-ovf: default-jre-headless 2:1.7-51
virtualbox-ovf:
virtualbox-ovf: E: Package 'java2-runtime-headless' has no installation
candidate
==> virtualbox-ovf: Unregistering and deleting imported VM...
==> virtualbox-ovf: Deleting output directory...
Build 'virtualbox-ovf' errored: Script exited with non-zero exit status: 100
But perhaps I missed something?
- Joshua
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46786/#review130924
-----------------------------------------------------------
On April 28, 2016, 3:48 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46786/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 28, 2016, 3:48 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Aurora, John Sirois and Stephan Erb.
>
>
> Repository: aurora
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> See http://markmail.org/message/rofuiaclgkesfx3o for full details.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> build-support/packer/build.sh 658dbc4bc5ae0dd1cfa69abd8fdf6119c3ccf8c9
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46786/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Successfully built base box with these changes.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joshua Cohen
>
>
