-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58259/#review173868
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




LGTM. Excited to see this in production.


src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/resources/ResourceBag.java
Lines 186 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58259/#comment246949>

    nit - s/greaterOrEqualThan/greaterThanOrEqual/


- Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham


On May 3, 2017, 5:09 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58259/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2017, 5:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham, Stephan Erb, and Zameer 
> Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In the Dynamic Reservations review (and on the mailing list), I mentioned 
> that we could implement update affinity with less complexity using the same 
> technique as preemption. Here is how that would work. 
> 
> This just adds a simple wrapper around the preemptor's BiCache structure and 
> then optimistically tries to keep an agent free for a task during the update 
> process. 
> 
> 
> Note: I don't bother even checking the resources before reserving the agent. 
> I figure there is a chance the agent has enough room, and if not we'll catch 
> it when we attempt to veto the offer. We need to always check the offer like 
> this anyway in case constraints change. In the worst case it adds some delay 
> in the rare cases you increase resources. 
> 
> We also don't persist the reservations, so if the Scheduler fails over during 
> an update, the worst case is that any instances between the KILLED and 
> ASSIGNED in-flight batch need to fall back to the current first-fit 
> scheduling algorithm.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   RELEASE-NOTES.md 1ee0d0167f0d212fa028f8ed0ddf20849703685c 
>   docs/operations/configuration.md f0581eade7296494d744b944ee8fddb94a5abaf6 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/TaskTestUtil.java 
> f0b148cd158d61cd89cc51dca9f3fa4c6feb1b49 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/resources/ResourceBag.java 
> 211f1fc4ce46b853124f63d8ab8e37ac2f3d2d92 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskScheduler.java 
> 203f62bacc47470545d095e4d25f7e0f25990ed9 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java 
> a177b301203143539b052524d14043ec8a85a46d 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceAction.java 
> b4cd01b3e03029157d5ca5d1d8e79f01296b57c2 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceActionHandler.java 
> f25dc0c6d9c05833b9938b023669c9c36a489f68 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceUpdater.java 
> c129896d8cd54abd2634e2a339c27921042b0162 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdateControllerImpl.java
>  e14112479807b4477b82554caf84fe733f62cf58 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/StateEvaluator.java 
> c95943d242dc2f539778bdc9e071f342005e8de3 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/UpdateAgentReserver.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/UpdaterModule.java 
> 13cbdadad606d9acaadc541320b22b0ae538cc5e 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/resources/ResourceBagTest.java 
> c1638265373e8f4cb508c08d5a62e07027eff9c8 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskSchedulerImplTest.java
>  fa1a81785802b82542030e1aae786fe9570d9827 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssignerImplTest.java 
> cf2d25ec2e407df7159e0021ddb44adf937e1777 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/AddTaskTest.java 
> b2c4c66850dd8f35e06a631809530faa3b776252 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceUpdaterTest.java 
> df1f8394b824dbb7b2745fcccdab5adaafdf6e6c 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdaterIT.java 
> 30b44f88a5b8477e917da21d92361aea1a39ceeb 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/KillTaskTest.java 
> 833fd62c870f96b96343ee5e0eed0d439536381f 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/NullAgentReserverTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/UpdateAgentReserverImplTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58259/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew build
> ./src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Cache utilization over time
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/04/25/7b41bd2b-4151-482c-9de2-9dee67c34133__declining-cache-hits.png
> Offer rate from Mesos over time
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/04/25/b107d964-ee7d-435a-a3d9-2b54f6eac3fa__consistent-offer-rate.png
> Async task workload (scaled) correlation with degraded cache utilization
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/04/25/7eaf37ac-fbf3-40eb-b3f6-90e914a3936f__async-task-correlation.png
> cache hit rate before and after scheduler tuning
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/05/02/39998e8d-2a75-4f5d-bfc0-bb93011407af__Screen_Shot_2017-05-01_at_6.30.18_PM.png
> JobUpdateControllerImpl bottleneck
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/05/02/f93484bd-c99e-4c01-9f8a-f0ad867adb26__Screen_Shot_2017-05-02_at_3.33.39_PM.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David McLaughlin
> 
>

Reply via email to