-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63973/#review191709
-----------------------------------------------------------



Master (0f3dc93) is red with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

  symbol:   variable OUTSTANDING_OFFERS
  location: class OfferManagerImplTest
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImplTest.java:206:
 error: cannot find symbol
    offerManager.addOffer(OFFER_A);
                ^
  symbol:   method addOffer(HostOffer)
  location: variable offerManager of type OfferManagerImpl
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImplTest.java:207:
 error: cannot find symbol
    assertEquals(0, statsProvider.getLongValue(OUTSTANDING_OFFERS));
                                               ^
  symbol:   variable OUTSTANDING_OFFERS
  location: class OfferManagerImplTest
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImplTest.java:214:
 error: cannot find symbol
    offerManager.addOffer(OFFER_A);
                ^
  symbol:   method addOffer(HostOffer)
  location: variable offerManager of type OfferManagerImpl
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImplTest.java:215:
 error: cannot find symbol
    assertEquals(OFFER_A, Iterables.getOnlyElement(offerManager.getOffers()));
                                                               ^
  symbol:   method getOffers()
  location: variable offerManager of type OfferManagerImpl
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
100 errors
 FAILED

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':compileTestJava'.
> Compilation failed; see the compiler error output for details.

* Try:
Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug 
option to get more log output.

* Get more help at https://help.gradle.org

BUILD FAILED in 3m 44s
27 actionable tasks: 21 executed, 6 up-to-date


I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Nov. 22, 2017, 8:38 a.m., Jordan Ly wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63973/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 22, 2017, 8:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham, 
> Stephan Erb, and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a rather large diff. Posting without tests first to get initial 
> impressions/make the review more digestible, but tests are soon to come.
> 
> Major portions of the refactor:
> 
> * Allows injection of custom `OfferManager` via `OfferManagerModule`
> * Refactor `OfferManager` to do filtering of offers (added `getMatching` and 
> `getAllMatching` methods) as opposed to TaskAssigner
> * Refactor `TaskAssigner`, allow for injection of custom "scoring" class 
> through `OfferRanker` interface
> 
> And some minor things as well:
> 
> * Moved `TaskAssignerImpl`, `TaskSchedulerImpl`, and `HostOffers` into their 
> own upper-level classes
> * Moved `TaskAssigner` to the `scheduling` package and out of the `state` 
> package
> * Renamed some methods in `OfferManager` to avoid code stutter
> * Renaming of some classes (e.g. `FirstFitTaskAssigner` -> `TaskAssignerImpl`)
> * And a slew of others
> 
> Overall, the goal of this refactor is to allow for the easy injection of 
> custom offer "scoring" modules via the `OfferRanker` interface. Callers will 
> not have to replace the entire `TaskAssigner` module, but instead just 
> provide a function that chooses from a list of offers that should already fit 
> the task.
> 
> Going through this review, I would start with the 
> `maybeAssign`/`launchUsingOffer` methods in `TaskAssigner`. Then, I would 
> look at `getMatching`/`getAllMatching` in `HostOffers`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/reference/scheduler-configuration.md 
> d17541f9458650240983276b69f749a854057aa8 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/AppModule.java 
> 3204cca5446d0f798ace622d334473bf6db13733 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/config/CliOptions.java 
> d4537e386af53ec9bff661ed23d61a5bd4893edf 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/AttributeAggregate.java 
> 60f141d34d862f200ae1346a38a71bba57551059 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilter.java 
> 36608a9f027c95723c31f9915852112beb367223 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilterImpl.java 
> df51d4cf4893899613683603ab4aa9aefa88faa6 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/Offers.java 
> f22ca6e5402d8ec7241376de14a9051ab0cfbfc6 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/MesosCallbackHandler.java 
> fd5874d51cfbca1b98d15623a9c845d208d43b1f 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/HostOffers.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManager.java 
> 96b0f46e69255944fa0f00621db315e22d68515c 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImpl.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferSettings.java 
> 57fc1a18f1b82decc780ba0069ab4dd0c125f77d 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OffersModule.java 
> 4a6ea8dac97ed2f5df47e4d16fa65a3b516988bd 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/preemptor/PendingTaskProcessor.java 
> 766d3b24fd64de96b82d3dd2a17f7a80331889d8 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/preemptor/Preemptor.java 
> 82a0ff67e9f70fed305f8f1bf38e3cf7955b9ce7 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/FirstFitOfferRanker.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/OfferRanker.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/SchedulingModule.java 
> 0796712a00e3cba595ceb049833933b9a70c2f9a 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskAssigner.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskAssignerImpl.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskAssignerImplModule.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskScheduler.java 
> 0002b0ceb429a404ac9dd0ae7e5ea9f6362fa100 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskSchedulerImpl.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/FirstFitTaskAssignerModule.java
>  dc244eeaa0d292a06d8750cb340fb379701ad49f 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/StateModule.java 
> c03fff11ea3a4086f9daaa8b07315006c1b481e4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java 
> cdd0d15872248b19d5eb52d25537f2f863fd5c77 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/stats/AsyncStatsModule.java 
> 6033c01477bec7a491128e3089ffc1b1c3f1c150 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63973/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tests coming soon, but they should be relatively close to what we have now on 
> master since we don't really add/remove features but just move them around.
> 
> Ran some benchmarks as well to ensure performance parity:
> 
> ```
> MASTER
> Benchmark                                                                     
>  Mode  Cnt       Score       Error  Units
> SchedulingBenchmarks.ClusterFullUtilizationBenchmark.runBenchmark             
> thrpt   10  113910.922 ± 26263.903  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.FillClusterBenchmark.runBenchmark                        
> thrpt   10     263.043 ±   299.686  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.InsufficientResourcesSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark    
> thrpt   10   12353.669 ±   433.182  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.LimitConstraintMismatchSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark  
> thrpt   10     893.263 ±    54.882  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.ValueConstraintMismatchSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark  
> thrpt   10   11478.420 ±  1068.819  ops/s
> ```
> and
> ```
> MY PATCH
> Benchmark                                                                     
>  Mode  Cnt       Score       Error  Units
> SchedulingBenchmarks.ClusterFullUtilizationBenchmark.runBenchmark             
> thrpt   10  124041.966 ± 33331.424  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.FillClusterBenchmark.runBenchmark                        
> thrpt   10    1030.434 ±  1223.539  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.InsufficientResourcesSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark    
> thrpt   10   12305.154 ±   375.814  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.LimitConstraintMismatchSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark  
> thrpt   10    1080.267 ±    74.635  ops/s
> SchedulingBenchmarks.ValueConstraintMismatchSchedulingBenchmark.runBenchmark  
> thrpt   10   11604.642 ±   586.248  ops/s
> ```
> 
> Not exactly sure why `FillClusterBenchmark` increased so dramatically -- I 
> will look into that while testing as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jordan Ly
> 
>

Reply via email to