-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65824/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, Renan DelValle, and Santhosh Kumar 
Shanmugham.


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

I had to revert the previous fix due to a bug around `JobDataMap` and 
manipulating it outside of a Quartz execution. See 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65810/ for context.

I believe that we can mitigate this by creating an `AtomicBoolean` and 
manipulating that within the `batchWorker` execution as opposed to directly 
changing the `JobDataMap`. This mirrors the previous behavior of 
`killFollowups` but while keeping the state within a given job context.


Diffs
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/cron/quartz/AuroraCronJob.java 
3604dd4c84043def3fe098ca0f87bf8bab99b3db 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/cron/quartz/AuroraCronJobTest.java 
5083fcd407a069617634b82db1ad799b5d4d4551 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65824/diff/1/


Testing
-------

`./gradlew test`

Manually verified bug in previous patch no longer occurs. Verified the bug the 
previous patch was fixing no longer occurs as well.
Will deploy to a test cluster.

Question for reviewers: Is it worthwhile to add end-to-end tests for scheduling 
crons and ensuring KILL_EXISTING works? The reason I am hesitant is that the 
coverage of this feature seem comprehensive enough but the bug that slipped 
through the previous patch was due to a subtle interaction with the Quartz 
scheduler which we mock in unit tests.


Thanks,

Jordan Ly

Reply via email to