-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66103/#review199418
-----------------------------------------------------------



Master (aaadad7) is red with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

        at org.easymock.internal.ReplayState.invoke(ReplayState.java:46)
        at 
org.easymock.internal.MockInvocationHandler.invoke(MockInvocationHandler.java:40)
        at 
org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:94)
        at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy21.changeState(Unknown Source)
        at 
org.apache.aurora.scheduler.TaskStatusHandlerImpl.lambda$run$0(TaskStatusHandlerImpl.java:158)
        at 
org.apache.aurora.scheduler.storage.Storage$MutateWork$NoResult.apply(Storage.java:144)
        at 
org.apache.aurora.scheduler.storage.Storage$MutateWork$NoResult.apply(Storage.java:139)
        at 
org.apache.aurora.scheduler.storage.testing.StorageTestUtil.lambda$expectWrite$1(StorageTestUtil.java:83)
        at org.easymock.internal.Result.answer(Result.java:106)
        at org.easymock.internal.ReplayState.invokeInner(ReplayState.java:60)
        at org.easymock.internal.ReplayState.invoke(ReplayState.java:46)
        at 
org.easymock.internal.MockInvocationHandler.invoke(MockInvocationHandler.java:40)
        at 
org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:94)
        at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy20.write(Unknown Source)
        at 
org.apache.aurora.scheduler.TaskStatusHandlerImpl.run(TaskStatusHandlerImpl.java:154)
        at 
com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutionThreadService$1$2.run(AbstractExecutionThreadService.java:66)
        at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Callables$4.run(Callables.java:122)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

I0319 16:19:42.150 [ShutdownHook, SchedulerMain] Stopping scheduler services. 

1081 tests completed, 1 failed, 1 skipped
:test FAILED
:jacocoTestReport
Coverage report generated: 
file:///home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/dist/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html
:jacocoTestCoverageVerification

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':test'.
> There were failing tests. See the report at: 
> file:///home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/AuroraBot/dist/reports/tests/test/index.html

* Try:
Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug 
option to get more log output.

* Get more help at https://help.gradle.org

BUILD FAILED in 7m 40s
45 actionable tasks: 36 executed, 9 up-to-date


I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On March 19, 2018, 2:58 p.m., Reza Motamedi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66103/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2018, 2:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, Daniel Knightly, Jordan Ly, 
> Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham, and Stephan Erb.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When disk isolation is enabled in a Mesos agent it calculates the disk usage 
> for each container. 
> Thermos Observer also monitors disk usage using `twitter.common.dirutil`, 
> essentially repeating the work already done by the agent. In practice, we see 
> that disk monitoring is one of the most expensive resource monitoring tasks. 
> For instance, when there are deeply nested directories, the CPU utilization 
> of the observer process can easily reach 1.5 CPUs. It would be ideal if we 
> delegate the disk monitoring task to the agent and do it only once. With this 
> approach, when disk collection has improved in the agent (for instance by 
> implementing XFS isolation), we can simply benefit from it without any code 
> change. Some more information about the problem is provided in AURORA-1918.
> 
> This patch that introduces `MesosDiskCollector` which queries the agent's API 
> endpoint to lookup disk_used_bytes. Note that there is also resource 
> monitoring in thermos executor. Currently, I left the disk collector there to 
> use the `du` implementation. That can be changed in a later patch.
> 
> I modified some vagrant config files including `aurora-executor.service` and 
> `etc_mesos-slave/isolation` for testing. They can be left as is. I included 
> them in this patch to show how this would work e2e.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/python/requirements.txt 4ac242cfa2c1c19cb7447816ab86e748839d3d11 
>   examples/jobs/hello_world.aurora 5401bfebe753b5e53abd08baeac501144ced9b5a 
>   examples/vagrant/mesos_config/etc_mesos-slave/isolation 
> 1a7028ffc70116b104ef3ad22b7388f637707a0f 
>   examples/vagrant/systemd/aurora-executor.service 
> 5a1a9082ecd7b1367ec677d760a5c375b6db9076 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/tools/thermos_observer.py 
> dd9f0c46ceac9e939b1b763073314161de0ea614 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/BUILD 
> 65ba7088f65e7baa5d30744736ba456b46a55e86 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/disk.py 
> 52c5d74fd70b5942ea3ef5101ba3f27bfc98fc21 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/resource.py 
> f5e3849ca6682c6d4720698be869ca6b9f703b94 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/task_observer.py 
> 4bb5d239e81fe4659397f899760c0e8853e93786 
>   
> src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/test_resource_manager_integration.py
>  fe74bd1d36666ecd89fca1b5b2251202cbbc0f24 
>   src/test/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/BUILD 
> 8f2b39336dce6c7b580e6ba0009f60afdcb89179 
>   src/test/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/test_disk.py 
> 362393bfd1facf3198e2d438d0596b16700b72b8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66103/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I added unit tests.
> Tested in vagrant and it works as intenced.
> I also built and deployed in our test enviroment. In order to measure 
> imporoved performance I created jobs with nested folders and noticed 
> reduction in CPU utilization of the Observer process, by at least 60%. (1.5 
> CPU cores to 0.4 CPU cores)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Reza Motamedi
> 
>

Reply via email to