----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66922/#review202343 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! LGTM. I think the Webhook test is being flaky again :/ Vagrantfile Lines 20-21 (original), 20-21 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66922/#comment284109> Should we need to update (or remove) this comment? - Jordan Ly On May 2, 2018, 10:08 p.m., Renan DelValle wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/66922/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 2, 2018, 10:08 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Changing Vagrant requirements to latest version for launching our local dev > box. > > Needed since we depend on the Vagrant Cloud instead of Atlas now. > > > Diffs > ----- > > Vagrantfile 76dfcaca08324a458d7ec45a85deb7a38d94b1f7 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66922/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran vagrant box with latest Vagrant version (2.0.4). > > > Thanks, > > Renan DelValle > >
