> On Jan. 16, 2014, 3:45 a.m., Jake Farrell wrote:
> > This patch does not have anything to do with gpg keys, is something missing 
> > from the diff? also we probably want to look at moving this into a 
> > build-support/release/ folder since there will be several actions pre/post 
> > vote that have to occur for a release that we can be scripted out

The relation to keys is subtle, but is there.  From git-tag's man page:

>       -u <key-id>
>           Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key

Jon is setting it up to select the key associated with the committer email 
address.

+1 on the release subdir suggestion


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16941/#review31998
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 16, 2014, 1:50 a.m., Jonathan Boulle wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16941/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 1:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> add support for multiple GPG keys and fix rollback instructions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build-support/tag-release 6940d5d5dadb8c68cf5268fbb5c790114de58c0a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16941/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Boulle
> 
>

Reply via email to