-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17063/#review32191
-----------------------------------------------------------



build-support/release/tag-release
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/17063/#comment60910>

    I went with this approach originally (apparently 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17026 went straight to spam) but ultimately 
reverted to keeping SNAPSHOT as always the next minor version - not sure what 
other opinions are


- Jonathan Boulle


On Jan. 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17063/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Update tag-release to allow patch level increments.
> 
> (just now noticed I branched off the status checker change -- ignore that for 
> now.)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build-support/release/tag-release 90dc5da2fcb515359174d289d69cac01009f6014 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/status_checker.py 
> efffa8fda06afb830c5f65fb6eb15f4510225e96 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17063/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Nope
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Wickman
> 
>

Reply via email to