> On Feb. 19, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/LogStorage.java, line 
> > 539
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/18241/diff/1/?file=497164#file497164line539>
> >
> >     This is too easy to forget. Any chance this assert could be moved into 
> > log() instead?

A marvelous suggestion, done!


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18241/#review34871
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 19, 2014, 12:55 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18241/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 12:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-134
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-134
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Don't unnecessarily invoke write() within LogStorage, and assert that a 
> transaction is open when a mutation is performed.
> 
> I'm starting to explore a refactor that further cleans this up by extracting 
> the *Store implementations out of LogStorage, which should simplify things by 
> separating transaction management from delegation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/LogStorage.java 
> 36e4082acceb3045ef92a5957b500e407bfc1247 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/testing/StorageTestUtil.java
>  005bad2c6b9f13e3438f3136e63fe777c6b42507 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/log/LogStorageTest.java 
> f708ab3c2fa5d50b084e037f9cc0cb998935120a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18241/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to