----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22457/#review49046 -----------------------------------------------------------
Mark - looks like this was committed, reverted, then re-committed. If it's now in, can you please close the review? - Bill Farner On July 17, 2014, 2:09 p.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/22457/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 17, 2014, 2:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Brian Wickman. > > > Bugs: aurora-520 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-520 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Add a new diff method, which uses field-by-field comparison of JSON trees for > comparing running job configurations to potentially updated configs. > > - Allow exclusion of semantically irrelevant fields. > - Provide a clearer list of the differences between configs. > - Provide a scripting-friendly alternative JSON syntax for diffs. > > The old diff behavior is still available under the "--use-shell-diff" option. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/BUILD > ebe681a0d1735b7cc695dc3b7a14c4292d87ae32 > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py > 4fa03a6c9919651551238b0dc211ed69a8dfe565 > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/json_tree_diff.py PRE-CREATION > src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/BUILD > 3c88ed7cf9f654bbbd80d1d44aa1dd1c8655e378 > src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_diff.py > 38629b63c082cf81cb891dace2a70d9e8f418e18 > src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_json_diff.py PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22457/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > New unit tests of the JSON tree diff code, plus a bunch of new "job diff" > tests of the new functionality. > All tests pass. > > > Thanks, > > Mark Chu-Carroll > >
