-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24432/#review49834
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/LockMapper.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/24432/#comment87223>

    How about INNER JOIN instead to be totally explicit?


- Maxim Khutornenko


On Aug. 7, 2014, 12:03 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24432/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 7, 2014, 12:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-640
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-640
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix incorrect join type used in LockMapper.xml.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/AttributeMapper.xml 
> deb25bddd826ba8d5fc3af6f7b853fba8d59e681 
>   src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/LockMapper.xml 
> 9e1f8e683697b1af1543be332c6da550e547971e 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/DbLockStoreTest.java 
> 283fc7ea1c4c5c102c34894a5b3bc4d828c002ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24432/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Modified a test case to point out the issue.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to