> On Aug. 15, 2014, 6:20 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > src/main/thrift/org/apache/aurora/gen/api.thrift, line 751
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/24744/diff/1/?file=661623#file661623line751>
> >
> >     We really should not expose the lock.  Any attempt to do anything with 
> > the lock will ~certainly interfere with the updater.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     How do we ensure pause/resume/abort is authorized to act on the update 
> then? Sure, storing the lock on the client is not a good idea but unless we 
> have some secondary way to authorize the action anyone could interfere with 
> the update given its ID.
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     That's exactly what we need.  Abort/pause/resume are unscoped, big red 
> buttons.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     So, anyone authorized to act on the job would be able to interfere? I 
> thought the big red button would be the cancel_update with the 
> abort/pause/resume allowed only to the update owner.
>     
>     In that case, I need to clear all job update apis from the Lock concept.

Actually, do we even have to expose updateId from the startJobUpdate api? Given 
that anyone with the job access could act on it now, requiring to enter 
udpateID any time abort/resume/pause is needed feels redundant and not user 
friendly. Should we rather drop updateID completely and assume 
abort/resume/pause would attempt to act on any existing job update (if one 
exists)?


- Maxim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24744/#review50755
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 15, 2014, 6:14 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24744/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2014, 6:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Mark Chu-Carroll and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The job lock is now acquired by the startJobUpdate call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/thrift/SchedulerThriftInterface.java
>  7ef28858ad290c74248b89c49d2a684eb1c7127e 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/__init__.py 
> 62de93bb942adab47590112b76c365fac7877371 
>   src/main/thrift/org/apache/aurora/gen/api.thrift 
> af9f02ed1de487bc5cc2967d2edcece5b21e0be5 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/thrift/SchedulerThriftInterfaceTest.java
>  649afa24b2cfc9a1d67d350473e439d209bd720c 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/thrift/aop/ForwardingThrift.java 
> 38bc9ed1ea17cac00920a2f1d066458badd7b4bb 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/api/test_api.py 
> 96db25d9f7492a0d49e98af27f17b6cee19f5a49 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/api/test_scheduler_client.py 
> ab74db34d61e72c50d4ac9252b02cbf69377d194 
>   src/test/resources/org/apache/aurora/gen/api.thrift.md5 
> 21a05f6939da1dd7fc15cf6336bc3fee283f16ab 
>   src/test/resources/org/apache/aurora/gen/storage.thrift.md5 
> 45762990d33969bedde7340887cde16a535e99fe 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24744/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> gradle -Pq build
> ./pants src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/api::
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to