> On Sept. 12, 2014, 5:09 p.m., Joe Smith wrote:
> > src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_task_run.py, line 228
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25582/diff/1/?file=687672#file687672line228>
> >
> >     "Test the ssh command for proper behavior when no tasks are found 
> > within a job" or something, I think

I'd go so far as to suggest that docstrings on test methods are probably not 
necessary. This exemplifies why, they just get copied/pasted from other tests 
and end up not accurately describing what each test does. I'd vote for 
descriptive test case names and do away with docstrings entirely.


- Joshua


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25582/#review53184
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 12, 2014, 2:34 p.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25582/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2014, 2:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: aurora-706
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-706
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix error in client "task ssh" command when the job isn't found.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/task.py 
> 91175facdc8ccccc9fd59ab66781f86ee8b5940a 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/commands/ssh.py 
> 37a90089b72b86c82466f1819e7881a36bb2f214 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_task_run.py 
> 8d9ef0543c1ab514d6f039ba63a1d417a4a90a1b 
>   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/commands/test_ssh.py 
> 4070b710b005c91fe08dd7906cd93bf3a8cdba9e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25582/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new tests to catch this case;
> Ran all client unit tests, all tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Chu-Carroll
> 
>

Reply via email to