-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25859/#review54066
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/JobUpdateDetailsMapper.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25859/#comment94013>

    This will fail unit tests as is.


- Maxim Khutornenko


On Sept. 20, 2014, 12:28 a.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25859/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2014, 12:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Angular has a thing where if you have asynchronous data *and* you bind it to 
> isolated scope in a directive, you need to explicitly watch the values for 
> changes. This was also the weird behaviour I saw before with SmartTable. 
> 
> I changed the ordering of update summaries to be reverse sorted by last event 
> time. Going to be required for a future (show me all in-flight updates) 
> feature. 
> 
> I also fixed a couple of problems with: progress stats, a missing terminal 
> state and the instance summary not updating when polling. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ui/js/controllers.js 
> bcb094adbafdf223eda49c012005994937d5dcf6 
>   src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ui/js/directives.js 
> 8b7fc0627597d53a788868d0ae16c0c063f36338 
>   src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ui/js/services.js 
> 8a719f85b0a095a93b723c04b0a5e8306093c572 
>   
> src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/JobUpdateDetailsMapper.xml
>  ad877ed168f80cc56561dffd028cff300336ea55 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25859/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew jsHint
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David McLaughlin
> 
>

Reply via email to