-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/#review57398
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/#comment98094>

    While you're here - mind fixing this up. "The Aurora scheduler is", and 
"0.20.0"



docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/#comment98095>

    IIUC you only need to do this on the very first replica (the tool tells the 
replicated log "you are actually empty"). Subsequent additions to the cluster 
should be able to automatically catch-up.


- Kevin Sweeney


On Oct. 16, 2014, 3:39 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 16, 2014, 3:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-840
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-840
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I ran out of ideas beyond these two.  Happy to add more if either of you can 
> think of them.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 380577e0f5a45dd0d521f3379d76febde841927b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Rendered here: 
> https://github.com/wfarner/incubator-aurora/blob/wfarner/operator_faq/docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to