> On Oct. 20, 2014, 6:55 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md, line 29
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/diff/1/?file=723464#file723464line29>
> >
> >     While you're here - mind fixing this up. "The Aurora scheduler is", and 
> > "0.20.0"

Done.


> On Oct. 20, 2014, 6:55 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md, line 219
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/diff/1/?file=723464#file723464line219>
> >
> >     IIUC you only need to do this on the very first replica (the tool tells 
> > the replicated log "you are actually empty"). Subsequent additions to the 
> > cluster should be able to automatically catch-up.

Thanks, re-worded.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/#review57398
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 16, 2014, 10:39 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 16, 2014, 10:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-840
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-840
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I ran out of ideas beyond these two.  Happy to add more if either of you can 
> think of them.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 380577e0f5a45dd0d521f3379d76febde841927b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26832/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Rendered here: 
> https://github.com/wfarner/incubator-aurora/blob/wfarner/operator_faq/docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to