> On Oct. 24, 2014, 5:57 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > Does it make sense to use the ReviewBoard Python client from rbtools? 
> > https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/0.5/api/overview/
> > 
> > What is the plan to actually run this script? Is it safe to assume that it 
> > will be executed from an up to date git repo, or will it need to git pull?
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     I'm hesitant, mostly because i don't think the code savings is worth the 
> cost of adding build infrastructure around this script.  I could be swayed, 
> though.

Yeah, I'm not sure it's worth it either, but figured it's worth mentioning.


- Joshua


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27145/#review58299
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 24, 2014, 5:32 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27145/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 24, 2014, 5:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-883
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-883
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I also removed `--stacktrace` from the gradle command.  This makes for better 
> tail output.  I originally added `--stacktrace` to help debug build flakiness 
> we were having due to jenkins machine configuration (but haven't had in a 
> very long time): https://reviews.apache.org/r/23776/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build-support/jenkins/build.sh 50ea950206b572f708feb0ebc1c3d04db6eaebd7 
>   build-support/jenkins/review_feedback.py PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27145/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've run this a handful of times on my workstation, it seems to be doing its 
> job.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to