> On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:38 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > build-support/release/release, line 138 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28447/diff/1/?file=776081#file776081line138> > > > > Should we not be pushing this branch? > > Bill Farner wrote: > I'll let you and Jake hash that out. I'm indifferent.
To avoid stalling the release, i'm going to proceed with pushing this branch. There is an 0.5.0-incubating, so this is not new. Feel free to continue the discussion. - Bill ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28447/#review63036 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:36 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/28447/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 8:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora and Jake Farrell. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > The git-push invocation on :140 would fail because after calling git-tag on > :139, we have a branch and tag of the same name. Need to tell git which one > we want to push. > > > Diffs > ----- > > build-support/release/release a72c308cdd1cca700017bdffe849fd094e31ab8b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28447/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Bill Farner > >
