-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30203/#review69487
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Zameer Manji


On Jan. 23, 2015, 1:48 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30203/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 23, 2015, 1:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1050
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1050
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See linked ticket for context on how this manifested.  Please don't be 
> overwhelmed by the large delta in this diff - a majority of it is 
> reorganizing code to live in more appropriate places.
> 
> This happened because the logic for offer matching and task launching were 
> out of sync.  For small tasks (smaller than `MIN_THERMOS_RESOURCES`), an 
> additional amount (`MIN_TASK_RESOURCES`) would be unintentionally added when 
> the task was launched, but this was not considered when comparing the task to 
> offers.  The test case `MesosTaskFactoryImplTest.testSmallTaskUpsizing` was 
> added to reproduce this bug.
> 
> This change does several things to make the situation more sane:
> - `ResourceSlot` no longer directly accesses command line arguments, to 
> simplify testing
> - You may no longer create a `ResourceSlot` from its constitutent parts, to 
> prevent accidental misuse
> - The algorithm used in `ResourceSlot` was simplified such that an epsilon is 
> always used for the executor resources, and that is subtracted from the final 
> resources required by the task.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/ResourceSlot.java 
> 0b15834ec67959d3be94f9a5240ed38f43ac4c5b 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/SchedulerMain.java 
> 72c7545e7f16549f6a9ccb5fb74a06f154a7ea94 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/LiveClusterState.java
>  e6bd1b517535cafce4976e585b377065dfd19796 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptionVictim.java
>  024a689d788804e95de76570674b6d4aa77d7495 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorImpl.java 
> 0204d14b19ae412236f19ca274d81decb4eba12d 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/Resources.java 
> 65c4b526c89a4d5607af4424ebe49bb48e296ae9 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilter.java 
> c2a342ce07bfb223193886038761f0da5230135d 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilterImpl.java 
> 1cb56f19c331508a1585077e9c4a98f52aac343b 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/ExecutorSettings.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/MesosTaskFactory.java 
> 5cc85f1f87f3b8355c89e8ecac19de1122a079e6 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/ResourceSlotTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/UserTaskLauncherTest.java 
> 7ba946422577c21cbc3b3edf8d30ee313b0ef251 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/SchedulerIT.java 
> 5e54364a49a208bd5f19b9649633dc8feca591e9 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorImplTest.java
>  36dbcf73686c5a3ade01f7a10fda8ac4bdbcc7ad 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/events/NotifyingSchedulingFilterTest.java
>  0b41156f2a574d3d3c2cf840926f307dfb1e726e 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/filter/SchedulingFilterImplTest.java
>  265c38d20136210e7639ac8ea915d307a4b72949 
>   
> src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/MesosTaskFactoryImplTest.java 
> c7de6e111300b009e1f9f430624a56100328184e 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/Offers.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30203/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to