> On Jan. 30, 2015, 10:55 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> > What about the other references to 0.20.1? (e.g., 
> > 3rdparty/python/requirements.txt).  Is it safe to update just one of them?
> 
> Kevin Sweeney wrote:
>     +1, please refer to previous mesos upgrade patches
>     
>     you'll also want to build new eggs and upload them to svn.apache.org so 
> the vagrant image will continue to work

Yeah, sorry - this was hasty.  Wow, i didn't know i needed to build artifacts 
as well.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30467/#review70432
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 30, 2015, 10:07 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30467/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 30, 2015, 10:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1028
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1028
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is needed to take advantage of the task reconciliation API and new 
> status update fields.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build.gradle f9f71a84493b782e9f6072e44e89a2c017cf2a09 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30467/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to