They could, but I don't think it would be worth the effort here.  In this
case, the code itself is of little value, it's a bonus that it is also a
performance hog.

On Monday, February 2, 2015, Zameer Manji <zma...@twopensource.com> wrote:

> Could the impact of this change be verified by our performance benchmarks?
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Aurora ReviewBot <wfar...@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wfar...@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30535/#review70684
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Ship it!
>>
>>
>> Master (a674581) is green with this patch.
>>   ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh
>>
>> I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing
>> "@ReviewBot retry"
>>
>> - Aurora ReviewBot
>>
>>
>> On Feb. 3, 2015, 12:42 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30535/
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > (Updated Feb. 3, 2015, 12:42 a.m.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, Kevin Sweeney, and Maxim
>> Khutornenko.
>> >
>> >
>> > Bugs: AURORA-1090
>> >     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1090
>> >
>> >
>> > Repository: aurora
>> >
>> >
>> > Description
>> > -------
>> >
>> > Remove shard uniqueness check from scheduler recovery phase.
>> >
>> >
>> > Diffs
>> > -----
>> >
>> >
>>  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/StorageBackfill.java
>> 1814658c044273f7c3a2348a16aea62e397cf860
>> >
>>  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/StorageBackfillTest.java
>> 93773eb5ba3bee1b3296e69ea30eabb531eeb661
>> >
>> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30535/diff/
>> >
>> >
>> > Testing
>> > -------
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Bill Farner
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>


-- 
-=Bill

Reply via email to