-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/#review72036
-----------------------------------------------------------


This patch does not apply cleanly on master (7b531e9), do you need to rebase?

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Feb. 11, 2015, 9:38 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 9:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-909
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-909
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Filtering out statically 
> banned offers.
> 
> Will not apply cleanly: diffed with https://reviews.apache.org/r/30890 as a 
> parent.
> 
> Original RB: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28617/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/OfferQueue.java 
> f66383830140e5eaba436f35ebb5192eee65947a 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java 
> ce47ff152e303fd2116bc3b9e91c0c1a8f76f258 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java 
> e1c29747c9854cf75bf63f6f085cf40ca68989af 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/OfferQueueImplTest.java 
> 4cf602ad32b972c18eb5a81e9b2f59c67859bdb2 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerImplTest.java 
> 5647349854a5e04de749c4d809684a0066d4da06 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerTest.java 
> 6cc13231560996b144101eba36577f49017aba06 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew -Pq build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to