-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/#review72876
-----------------------------------------------------------


This patch does not apply cleanly on master (ec66a5e), do you need to rebase?

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Feb. 18, 2015, 2:01 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2015, 2:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-909
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-909
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Offer filtering for static vetoes. Part 3 of 4: Filtering out statically 
> banned offers.
> 
> Will not apply cleanly: diffed with https://reviews.apache.org/r/30890 as a 
> parent.
> 
> Original RB: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28617/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/OfferQueue.java 
> 332338b7bef7d622333f8ea6508c4f5970b8e7c4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java 
> ced3bdef1731354aedc82bb12f45ba6f040e1ab7 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java 
> 5a0f7ddb7e8fa6869cbb0fdfd07c6881780c6917 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/OfferQueueImplTest.java 
> 2b5dc4902f57e508d76f5e16997ae09d04464220 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerImplTest.java 
> d0e11932e8b5ba1393279137c8465a308e1d6bf5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerTest.java 
> 74e31334bc139c47eb8b0beee46ee7bad62a2f80 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30891/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew -Pq build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to