desaikomal opened a new pull request, #2486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2486

   ### Issues
   
   - [] My PR addresses the following Helix issues and references them in the 
PR description:
   
   ### Description
   
   - [ ] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   - Small bug fixes related to ZK disconnect.
       We added the fix where we retry with exponential backoff.
       There are some new failures in the test because tests have become 
underministic wrt time to wait.
       So let us remove randomness by explicitly waiting for thread to join.
       Also, retryCount should start with 0 and then increment it.
       This is the same behavior in other Exponential backoff call in other ZK 
API.
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [ ] The following tests are written for this issue:
   
   (List the names of added unit/integration tests)
   
   - The following is the result of the "mvn test" command on the appropriate 
module:
   
   (If CI test fails due to known issue, please specify the issue and test PR 
locally. Then copy & paste the result of "mvn test" to here.)
       Testing Done: mvn test (in zookeeper-api as well as helix-core)
       [ERROR] Failures:
       [ERROR]   
TestNoThrottleDisabledPartitions.testDisablingTopStateReplicaByDisablingInstance:98
 expected:<false> but was:<true>
       [ERROR]   
TestNoThrottleDisabledPartitions.testNoThrottleOnDisabledInstance:231->setupEnvironment:317->setupCluster:436
 ยป ZkClient
       [ERROR]   TestP2PNoDuplicatedMessage.testP2PStateTransitionEnabled:180 
expected:<true> but was:<false>
       [ERROR]   TestStateTransitionTimeout.testStateTransitionTimeOut:170 
expected:<true> but was:<false>
       [ERROR]   
TestWagedRebalanceTopologyAware.testAddZone:112->TestWagedRebalanceFaultZone.testAddZone:288
 expected:<true> but was:<false>
       [ERROR] Tests run: 1326, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
   
   ### Changes that Break Backward Compatibility (Optional)
   
   - My PR contains changes that break backward compatibility or previous 
assumptions for certain methods or API. They include:
   
   (Consider including all behavior changes for public methods or API. Also 
include these changes in merge description so that other developers are aware 
of these changes. This allows them to make relevant code changes in feature 
branches accounting for the new method/API behavior.)
   
   ### Documentation (Optional)
   
   - In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation in the following 
wiki page:
   
   (Link the GitHub wiki you added)
   
   ### Commits
   
   - My commits all reference appropriate Apache Helix GitHub issues in their 
subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to 
write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - My diff has been formatted using helix-style.xml 
   (helix-style-intellij.xml if IntelliJ IDE is used)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to