desaikomal opened a new pull request, #2486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2486
### Issues
- [] My PR addresses the following Helix issues and references them in the
PR description:
### Description
- [ ] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI
changes:
- Small bug fixes related to ZK disconnect.
We added the fix where we retry with exponential backoff.
There are some new failures in the test because tests have become
underministic wrt time to wait.
So let us remove randomness by explicitly waiting for thread to join.
Also, retryCount should start with 0 and then increment it.
This is the same behavior in other Exponential backoff call in other ZK
API.
### Tests
- [ ] The following tests are written for this issue:
(List the names of added unit/integration tests)
- The following is the result of the "mvn test" command on the appropriate
module:
(If CI test fails due to known issue, please specify the issue and test PR
locally. Then copy & paste the result of "mvn test" to here.)
Testing Done: mvn test (in zookeeper-api as well as helix-core)
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]
TestNoThrottleDisabledPartitions.testDisablingTopStateReplicaByDisablingInstance:98
expected:<false> but was:<true>
[ERROR]
TestNoThrottleDisabledPartitions.testNoThrottleOnDisabledInstance:231->setupEnvironment:317->setupCluster:436
ยป ZkClient
[ERROR] TestP2PNoDuplicatedMessage.testP2PStateTransitionEnabled:180
expected:<true> but was:<false>
[ERROR] TestStateTransitionTimeout.testStateTransitionTimeOut:170
expected:<true> but was:<false>
[ERROR]
TestWagedRebalanceTopologyAware.testAddZone:112->TestWagedRebalanceFaultZone.testAddZone:288
expected:<true> but was:<false>
[ERROR] Tests run: 1326, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
### Changes that Break Backward Compatibility (Optional)
- My PR contains changes that break backward compatibility or previous
assumptions for certain methods or API. They include:
(Consider including all behavior changes for public methods or API. Also
include these changes in merge description so that other developers are aware
of these changes. This allows them to make relevant code changes in feature
branches accounting for the new method/API behavior.)
### Documentation (Optional)
- In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation in the following
wiki page:
(Link the GitHub wiki you added)
### Commits
- My commits all reference appropriate Apache Helix GitHub issues in their
subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to
write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
1. Subject does not end with a period
1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
1. Body wraps at 72 characters
1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
### Code Quality
- My diff has been formatted using helix-style.xml
(helix-style-intellij.xml if IntelliJ IDE is used)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]