jiajunwang commented on issue #2751: URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/issues/2751#issuecomment-1924465613
It seems to be related to state priority or state transition priority. I don't think Helix optimizes the cost of transition today. I vote for enhancing this. Best Regards, Jiajun On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:15 PM Xiaotian (Jackie) Jiang < ***@***.***> wrote: > Describe the bug > > The state machine has the following state transitions: > > - CONSUMING -> OFFLINE > - OFFLINE -> DROPPED > - CONSUMING -> DROPPED > > When a partition of state CONSUMING is dropped from the ideal state, we > expect one state transition CONSUMING -> DROPPED to be sent. But we > observe it is performed as 2 state transitions: CONSUMING -> OFFLINE > followed by OFFLINE -> DROPPED > > Is this the expected behavior? Could this be a regression? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/helix/issues/2751>, or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANYM2DKKTI662ZOVS5AJVLYRQAX7AVCNFSM6AAAAABCVTLMQKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGEYTGNBZG44TAOI> > . > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message > ID: ***@***.***> > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
