GrantPSpencer opened a new pull request, #2994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2994

   ### Issues
   
   - [ ] My PR addresses the following Helix issues and references them in the 
PR description:
   
   Feature warranted by discussion from PR #2932 
   Discussion here: 
https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/2932#discussion_r1868312803
   
   ### Description
   
   - [ ] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   
   This PR adds an ATOMIC recursive delete method and uses it for 
dropping/purging instances from the cluster. The deleteRecursivelyAtomic method 
will either fully fail or fully succeed. This will prevent partially deleted 
instances from entering the cluster into an invalid state. This behaves 
similarly to the current deleteRecursively method, but with the addition of 
atomicity. There are two signatures available, one for deleting a single path 
and its children, and one for deleting multiple paths and all their children. 
Atomicity across different paths is needed to ensure atomicity of dropping an 
instance. 
   
   The FederatedZkClient implementation throws an IllegalArgumentException when 
deleteRecursivelyAtomic is called upon 2 paths that exist in different ZK 
realms as atomicity cannot be guaranteed across different realms due to their 
being 2 separate ZKClients and therefore 2 separate calls. 
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [ ] The following tests are written for this issue:
   
   testDeleteRecursivelyAtomic in TestRawZkClient.java
   
   - The following is the result of the "mvn test" command on the appropriate 
module:
   
   Ran manual CI on my personal fork and saw no new failing tests introduced. 
   
   ### Changes that Break Backward Compatibility (Optional)
   
   - My PR contains changes that break backward compatibility or previous 
assumptions for certain methods or API. They include:
   
   N/A
   
   
   ### Commits
   
   - My commits all reference appropriate Apache Helix GitHub issues in their 
subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to 
write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - My diff has been formatted using helix-style.xml 
   (helix-style-intellij.xml if IntelliJ IDE is used)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to