Jim Apple has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9085 )

Change subject: IMPALA-6070: Expose using Docker to run tests faster.
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(11 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/1//COMMIT_MSG@28
PS1, Line 28: Besides the obvious win of getting test results more quickly, this
> Here are a few pointers.
I think I understand. Would you file a ticket against me to fix or remove the 
docker instructions in bin/bootstrap_development.sh?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/3//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/3//COMMIT_MSG@48
PS3, Line 48: IMPALA-6494
> I agree that this is a blocker for saying turning off GVOs as they are toda
Now that this can be dealt with by static linking, what are your thoughts?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/1/docker/entrypoint.sh
File docker/entrypoint.sh:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/1/docker/entrypoint.sh@79
PS1, Line 79:   fi
> I think there is more overlap. The hosts munging is in both places, for ins
It looks to me like this comment was missed in the last round.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/1/docker/entrypoint.sh@142
PS1, Line 142: ably because ther
> I'd suggest changing GVD back for some time while you and I work through th
That build flag is also implicated in IMPALA-6494, it appears.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/3/docker/monitor.py
File docker/monitor.py:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/3/docker/monitor.py@221
PS3, Line 221:         line.strip()
> Done. I'm a little bit confused about why the autopep8 thing you mentioned
I think it may be hesitant in reformatting comments, which may need rewriting.

"Multi-line docstrings consist of a summary line just like a one-line 
docstring, followed by a blank line, followed by a more elaborate description."

That summary line is normally just a single line, so this docstring and one 
above are not in the convention.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/monitor.py
File docker/monitor.py:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/monitor.py@149
PS4, Line 149: container (again, a path)
This may be an issue of my mediocre Python literacy, but you refer to 
container.id_, but I don't see id_ on 
https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.path.html


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/test-with-docker.py
File docker/test-with-docker.py:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/test-with-docker.py@49
PS4, Line 49: # Suggested speed improvement TODOs:
nit: can you move these TODOs next to the other ones in this region of comments?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/timeline.html.template
File docker/timeline.html.template:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/timeline.html.template@23
PS4, Line 23: ow
nit: row


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/timeline.html.template@41
PS4, Line 41: user CPU
Is the unit "percent of CPU used in this container since the previous 
timestamp"?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/timeline.html.template@51
PS4, Line 51: the string
What is the string?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9085/4/docker/timeline.html.template@77
PS4, Line 77: browser local time
super-nit: what happens for builds when the clock in the browser local time was 
non-monotonic or jumped ahead, as in DST?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9085
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I82052ef31979564968effef13a3c6af0d5c62767
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9085
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Philip Zeyliger <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jim Apple <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lars Volker <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Philip Zeyliger <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 00:54:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to